There has been a lot of discussion both on social media and in the press about how GPs are performing, particularly after the very challenging times the healthcare sector in particular experienced during the Covid-19 pandemic, in which day-to-day services were immensely impacted.
Of course, patient experiences will differ, and we all have unique expectations of what sort of service our local NHS medical centres should be providing us. However, we wanted to see if there was any correlation between how the general public rate their GP surgery, and how official bodies – the Care Quality Commission (CQC) – rate the services that are being provided to patients.
We also wanted to see if there were any area-specific trends that indicate a ‘postcode lottery’ when it comes to the provision of local healthcare.
To find out, we looked at the latest CQC inspection reports and Google reviews of over 850 different GP practices in 21 major UK towns and cities. This is what we found.

Overall, there is a disconnect between patient reviews and official ratings
Nearly all GP surgeries that we analysed in England (96%) have been rated either ‘Good’ (91%) or ‘Outstanding (5%) by the Care Quality Commission (CQC).
However, online reviews left by patients on Google are telling us a different story with the average score coming out at just 2.81 out of five – which may be considered only ‘satisfactory’ or ‘OK’.
According to the CQC figures, just 2% of the general practices we looked into were deemed to ‘Require Improvement’ during their last inspection, and fewer still – just 1% - received an overall ‘Inadequate’ service report rating.
In comparison, five times as many (15%) had a poor online patient review score of 2/5 or less, and just 11% of the practices had an average Google review score of 4/5 (or higher).
Essentially, the CQC has determined that nine in ten GP practices are performing well, but the public reviews indicate that that nine in ten GP practices (89%) are not offering a service of a standard that patients would consider to be particularly good.
Overall CQC Report Rating |
% |
|
Inadequate |
7 |
1% |
Requires improvement |
21 |
2% |
Good |
785 |
91% |
Outstanding |
47 |
5% |
Total Google Reviews |
Average Rating |
Total number of GP surgeries analysed (CQC and Google Reviews) |
39532 |
2.81 |
860 |
The figures do vary by location
If we drill down into the data more, there is a little bit of consistency between the Google review and CQC figures in some places - but not all.
For example, in the last CQC inspections of surgeries in Exeter, 35% earned an overall ‘Outstanding’ level – which was the highest of all the locations we looked into and was in line with patient reviews which were a higher-than-average 3.52/5 too. Exeter also doesn’t have a single practice with an overall CQC status below ‘Good’ at this time.
Patient reports suggest there is particular room for improvement in Peterborough, where GPs based there have received an average Google review rating of just 2.4/5 – which was the lowest of all the 21 towns and cities analysed.
No GPs in Peterborough were rated ‘Inadequate’ by the CQC though – when last inspected, two practices (11%) were considered to require some improvement overall, while three (16%) had been awarded an ‘Outstanding’ rating.
Joining Peterborough at the bottom of the table for online patient reviews was Birmingham (2.59/5), which also has the most GPs that were rated as ‘Inadequate’ overall by the Care Quality Commission (in the areas we looked at) – and a relatively high 6% were deemed to need some improvement.
There are also four surgeries here featured in our ‘worst 20’ according to average Google Reviews figures – you can see this list further down this article.
Hull had a low patient review score, but no GPs were reported to be offering a service below expected levels when they were last officially inspected by the CQC.

The figures do vary by location
If we drill down into the data more, there is a little bit of consistency between the Google review and CQC figures in some places - but not all.
For example, in the last CQC inspections of surgeries in Exeter, 35% earned an overall ‘Outstanding’ level – which was the highest of all the locations we looked into and was in line with patient reviews which were a higher-than-average 3.52/5 too. Exeter also doesn’t have a single practice with an overall CQC status below ‘Good’ at this time.
Patient reports suggest there is particular room for improvement in Peterborough, where GPs based there have received an average Google review rating of just 2.4/5 – which was the lowest of all the 21 towns and cities analysed.
No GPs in Peterborough were rated ‘Inadequate’ by the CQC though – when last inspected, two practices (11%) were considered to require some improvement overall, while three (16%) had been awarded an ‘Outstanding’ rating.
Joining Peterborough at the bottom of the table for online patient reviews was Birmingham (2.59/5), which also has the most GPs that were rated as ‘Inadequate’ overall by the Care Quality Commission (in the areas we looked at) – and a relatively high 6% were deemed to need some improvement.
There are also four surgeries here featured in our ‘worst 20’ according to average Google Reviews figures – you can see this list further down this article.
Hull had a low patient review score, but no GPs were reported to be offering a service below expected levels when they were last officially inspected by the CQC.
There are some trends in the ‘worst-rated’ list
While our research was only focused around 21 towns and cities in England (so this list isn’t reflective of the worst-rated across the whole of the UK) it is interesting to see some trends in places that appear several times.
For example, Leicester features six times on this list, Birmingham is featured four times, and there are two Manchester surgeries are on the list.
Despite receiving the lowest overall patient review rating on Google, no specific Peterborough GPs made the worst rated list, however.
Twenty of the Worst-Rated GP Surgeries in the UK, according to Google Reviews
Surgery Name |
Third Line Address |
Postcode |
Number of Google Reviews |
Average Google Reviews Rating (out of 5) |
|
1 |
LAURIE PIKE HEALTH CENTRE |
BIRMINGHAM |
B6 6BB |
245 |
1.3 |
2 |
HERON GP PRACTICE |
LEICESTER |
LE5 3GH |
44 |
1.3 |
3 |
DUKE MEDICAL CENTRE |
SHEFFIELD |
S2 2TD |
50 |
1.3 |
4 |
RAYDOCS NEWTOWN |
BIRMINGHAM |
B19 2ET |
127 |
1.4 |
5 |
CONWAY MEDICAL CENTRE |
LEEDS |
LS8 5DE |
24 |
1.4 |
6 |
KINGSWAY SURGERY |
LEICESTER |
LE3 2JN |
110 |
1.4 |
7 |
PARKER DRIVE SURGERY |
LEICESTER |
LE4 0JF |
81 |
1.4 |
8 |
COSSINGTON PARK SURGERY |
LEICESTER |
LE4 6AW |
26 |
1.4 |
9 |
BOUSFIELD SURGERY - DR SHAH |
LIVERPOOL |
L4 4PP |
14 |
1.4 |
10 |
STANLEY MEDICAL CENTRE |
LIVERPOOL |
L5 2QA |
31 |
1.4 |
11 |
BILBOROUGH MEDICAL CENTRE |
NOTTINGHAM |
NG8 4PN |
102 |
1.4 |
12 |
MAYFLOWER MEDICAL GROUP |
PLYMOUTH |
PL5 1PL |
74 |
1.4 |
13 |
PAK HEALTH CENTRE |
BIRMINGHAM |
B8 1JA |
45 |
1.5 |
14 |
BELLEVUE MEDICAL CENTRE |
BIRMINGHAM |
B5 7LX |
163 |
1.5 |
15 |
MODALITY PARTNERSHIP (HULL) |
HULL |
HU5 2NT |
24 |
1.5 |
16 |
THURMASTON HEALTH CENTRE |
LEICESTER |
LE4 8EA |
81 |
1.5 |
17 |
THE WILLOWS MEDICAL CENTRE |
LEICESTER |
LE5 4LJ |
100 |
1.5 |
18 |
BIGHAM ROAD MEDICAL CENTRE |
LIVERPOOL |
L6 6DW |
10 |
1.5 |
19 |
DICKENSON ROAD MEDICAL CENTRE |
MANCHESTER |
M13 0WQ |
70 |
1.5 |
20 |
SEVEN BROOKS MEDICAL CTR. |
MANCHESTER |
M46 9DE |
40 |
1.5 |
Please note, we did not include any practices with fewer than 10 Google Reviews in this list.
If we compare this against our list of the surgeries that the CQC rated as being ‘inadequate’ overall – which was just 7 of the 860 we looked in – we can see a couple of familiar practices such the Stanley Medical Centre in Liverpool and the Mayflower Medical Centre in Plymouth.
Both of these were inspected fairly recently (2021), potentially due to reports from patients that they were dissatisfied with the service they received. Since their inspections, these practices may have made several improvements.
GP Surgeries Rated Inadequate (Overall) in their Last CQC Inspections
Surgery Name |
City / Town |
Average Google Reviews Rating (out of 5) |
Last CQC Inspection Date |
STANLEY MEDICAL CENTRE |
LIVERPOOL |
1.4 |
16/12/2021 |
MAYFLOWER MEDICAL GROUP |
PLYMOUTH |
1.4 |
06/12/2021 |
SCHOOL HOUSE SURGERY (NOW CALLED ALLIED MEDICAL PRACTICE) |
BRIGHTON |
1.7 |
05/05/2019 |
LONDON STREET SURGERY |
READING |
2.1 |
14/04/2022 |
HALCYON MEDICAL |
BIRMINGHAM |
2.5 |
05/04/2019 |
AR-RAZI MEDICAL CENTRE |
LEICESTER |
2.7 |
08/02/2022 |
GREAT BARR PRACTICE |
BIRMINGHAM |
3.7 |
22/03/2022 |
It’s a similar story with the top-rated surgeries too
We created a list for the top-rated GP surgeries on Google too, and it was the Astley General Practice in Manchester that took first place, despite the city’s local medical providers getting an overall low average score on Google reviews.
Birmingham was also featured four times - but again scored low on average overall with patients on Google - while Cambridge took three spots in the top 20, which is more in line with its high online review average.
Twenty of the Best-Rated GP Surgeries in the UK, according to Google Reviews
|
Surgery Name |
City |
Postcode |
Number of Google Reviews |
Average Google Reviews Rating (out of 5) |
1 |
ASTLEY GENERAL PRACTICE |
MANCHESTER |
M29 7BY |
27 |
5 |
2 |
THE BOAT HOUSE SURGERY |
READING |
RG8 7DP |
14 |
4.8 |
3 |
STONECROFT MEDICAL CENTRE |
SHEFFIELD |
S12 2LJ |
61 |
4.7 |
4 |
STONEGATE MEDICAL CLINIC |
YORK |
YO1 8AW |
27 |
4.7 |
5 |
GARRETTS GREEN LANE SURGERY |
BIRMINGHAM |
B26 2SB |
10 |
4.6 |
6 |
COTMORE SURGERY |
BIRMINGHAM |
B44 8TU |
16 |
4.6 |
7 |
OVER SURGERY |
CAMBRIDGE |
CB24 5NZ |
51 |
4.6 |
8 |
OAKFIELDS HEALTH GROUP |
NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE |
NE17 7SB |
21 |
4.6 |
9 |
BAMPTON SURGERY |
OXFORD |
OX18 2LJ |
55 |
4.6 |
10 |
CHEW MEDICAL PRACTICE |
BRISTOL |
BS40 8UE |
19 |
4.5 |
11 |
HALL GREEN HEALTH |
BIRMINGHAM |
B28 8BG |
809 |
4.5 |
12 |
WILLINGHAM MEDICAL PRACTICE |
CAMBRIDGE |
CB24 5LB |
21 |
4.5 |
13 |
BURWELL SURGERY |
CAMBRIDGE |
CB25 0AE |
16 |
4.5 |
14 |
BARNFIELD HILL SURGERY |
EXETER |
EX1 1SR |
14 |
4.5 |
15 |
WOODSTOCK SURGERY |
OXFORD |
OX20 1UB |
13 |
4.5 |
16 |
WELLINGTON ROAD SURGERY |
BRISTOL |
BS37 5UY |
21 |
4.4 |
17 |
HOLLYWOOD MEDICAL CENTRE |
BIRMINGHAM |
B47 5DP |
13 |
4.4 |
18 |
VAUXHALL HEALTH CENTRE |
LIVERPOOL |
L5 8XR |
26 |
4.4 |
19 |
WEST HOE SURGERY |
PLYMOUTH |
PL1 3BS |
27 |
4.4 |
20 |
GREYSTONES MEDICAL CENTRE |
SHEFFIELD |
S11 7BJ |
11 |
4.4 |
Please note, we did not include any practices with fewer than 10 Google Reviews in this list.
When we compared the list of top top-rated surgeries on Google with those that were awarded an ‘Outstanding’ status by the CQC, there was again some consistency between the results.
Several practices appeared on both lists – Astley General Practice and Ancoats Urban Village Medical Practice in Manchester, Granta Medical Practice in Cambridge, Woodbury Surgery in Exeter, and Stonegate Medical Practice in York.
GP Surgeries Rated Outstanding (Overall) in their Last CQC Inspections
Surgery Name |
City |
Number of Google Reviews |
Average Google Reviews Rating (out of 5) |
Last CQC Inspection Date |
HAXBY GROUP CALVERT & NEWINGTON |
HULL |
47 |
1.9 |
29/11/2018 |
ROBIN LANE HEALTH AND WELLBEING CENTRE |
LEEDS |
80 |
2.1 |
29/06/2016 |
HAXBY GROUP HULL |
HULL |
73 |
2.3 |
30/11/2018 |
PORTER BROOK MEDICAL CENTRE |
SHEFFIELD |
96 |
2.3 |
18/12/2019 |
NORTHPOINT |
HULL |
9 |
2.4 |
16/06/2016 |
THE GOLDEN BROOK PRACTICE |
NOTTINGHAM |
33 |
2.4 |
20/11/2017 |
WHADDON HEALTHCARE |
MILTON KEYNES |
71 |
2.5 |
02/08/2016 |
ST THOMAS MEDICAL GROUP |
EXETER |
76 |
2.6 |
16/01/2018 |
HEATON ROAD SURGERY |
NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE |
43 |
2.6 |
10/02/2015 |
FOXHAYES PRACTICE |
EXETER |
29 |
2.7 |
14/12/2017 |
LEICESTER CITY ASSIST PRACTICE |
LEICESTER |
3 |
2.7 |
06/11/2014 |
THISTLEMOOR MEDICAL CENTRE |
PETERBOROUGH |
128 |
2.7 |
09/03/2022 |
ROTTON PARK MEDICAL CENTRE |
BIRMINGHAM |
28 |
2.8 |
19/12/2016 |
THE FORUM HEALTH CENTRE |
COVENTRY |
92 |
2.8 |
01/12/2016 |
ROPEWALKS GEN. PRACTICE |
LIVERPOOL |
69 |
2.8 |
15/12/2016 |
FIVE OAKS FAMILIY PRACTICE |
MANCHESTER |
60 |
2.8 |
05/04/2016 |
THE HEIGHT GENERAL PRACTICE |
MANCHESTER |
43 |
2.8 |
22/08/2017 |
WEST ROAD MEDICAL CENTRE |
NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE |
28 |
2.8 |
28/08/2019 |
RIDGACRE HOUSE SURGERY |
BIRMINGHAM |
60 |
2.9 |
12/03/2019 |
KIRKSTALL LANE MEDICAL CENTRE |
LEEDS |
41 |
2.9 |
10/03/2019 |
ST LEONARDS PRACTICE |
EXETER |
60 |
3.1 |
13/06/2018 |
CHP LTD - BRANSHOLME |
HULL |
52 |
3.2 |
16/06/2016 |
BURTON CROFT SURGERY (Dr Moxon & Partners) |
LEEDS |
44 |
3.3 |
17/11/2016 |
THE DOC'S SURGERY |
MANCHESTER |
64 |
3.3 |
21/06/2016 |
WEST GORTON MEDICAL PRACTICE |
MANCHESTER |
39 |
3.3 |
23/05/2018 |
THE OAKS MEDICAL CENTRE |
NOTTINGHAM |
49 |
3.3 |
17/11/2015 |
KINGSBURY ROAD MEDICAL CENTRE |
BIRMINGHAM |
21 |
3.4 |
05/03/2019 |
INCLUSION HEALTHCARE |
LEICESTER |
5 |
3.4 |
06/11/2014 |
EASTWOOD PRIMARY CARE CENTRE |
NOTTINGHAM |
17 |
3.7 |
24/05/2016 |
CAMBRIDGE ACCESS SURGERY |
CAMBRIDGE |
8 |
3.8 |
01/12/2021 |
LAUREL BANK SURGERY |
LEEDS |
46 |
3.8 |
10/11/2016 |
LUTHER STREET MEDICAL PRACTICE |
OXFORD |
13 |
3.8 |
20/04/2016 |
BOROUGHBURY MEDICAL CENTRE |
PETERBOROUGH |
212 |
3.8 |
29/03/2022 |
UNIVERSITY MEDICAL GROUP |
READING |
128 |
3.9 |
17/06/2019 |
SPRINGBANK SURGERY |
YORK |
4 |
4 |
14/09/2016 |
ARCH HEALTHCARE |
BRIGHTON |
16 |
4.1 |
28/01/2019 |
WYNDHAM HOUSE SURGERY |
EXETER |
8 |
4.1 |
26/08/2015 |
THORNTON MEDICAL CENTRE |
LEEDS |
36 |
4.1 |
05/12/2019 |
GOSFORTH MEMORIAL MED.CTR |
NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE |
28 |
4.1 |
15/03/2016 |
CADBURY HEATH HEALTHCARE |
BRISTOL |
20 |
4.2 |
25/07/2019 |
GRANTA MEDICAL PRACTICES |
CAMBRIDGE |
16 |
4.3 |
14/10/2019 |
WOODBURY SURGERY |
EXETER |
10 |
4.3 |
20/09/2016 |
ANCOATS URBAN VILLAGE MEDICAL PRACTICE |
MANCHESTER |
61 |
4.3 |
23/06/2015 |
STONEGATE MEDICAL CLINIC |
YORK |
27 |
4.7 |
17/05/2019 |
CHERITON BISHOP SURGERY |
EXETER |
4 |
4.8 |
15/07/2015 |
ASTLEY GENERAL PRACTICE |
MANCHESTER |
27 |
5 |
23/05/2017 |
ABBEYVIEW SURGERY |
PETERBOROUGH |
8 |
5 |
05/03/2020 |
Many of the CQC reviews are quite old
Another thing we spotted while conducting our research was that a massive eight in ten GP surgeries haven’t been inspected since the start of the Covid-19 pandemic in March 2020.
% |
|||
Inspected in March 2020 or earlier (not inspected since Covid) |
575 |
81% |
|
Not inspected since 2018 or earlier |
745 |
56% |

While the CQC advises that it has introduced a monthly review of the information they hold, and they are using this to help prioritise their activity and guide them in how to respond, we noticed that there are a few practices that were considered to be performing below expected levels in their last official inspection several years ago but haven’t since been reviewed again.
Equally, the CQC advises that additional checks may be carried out for GPs deemed to be at ‘higher risk’ – with these checks including things such as the gathering of people’s experiences of care. However, again, we noticed several instances of surgeries getting poor online patient reviews but no official inspection having taken place there by the CQC for at least three years.
The reports go into quite a lot of detail
For anyone who would like to see how their own GP surgery stacked up in its latest CQC inspection, it’s easy to look this up yourself here.
While each report offers an overall rating, there is often more detail on how safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led it considered to be.
Furthermore, some practices also have additional ratings for the service they offer specific types of patients.
Nationwide, we noted that surgeries were most likely to have been officially classified as ‘Inadequate’ in the overall safety and leadership/management criteria, while an ‘Outstanding’ rating was most likely to have been awarded to practices who evidenced high levels of responsiveness.
Is it...? CQC Rating |
Safe |
Effective |
Caring |
Responsive |
Well-Led |
Inadequate |
1% |
0.3% |
0.0% |
0.2% |
1% |
Requires improvement |
3% |
5% |
1% |
4% |
2% |
Good |
96% |
92% |
95% |
88% |
91% |
Outstanding |
1% |
3% |
4% |
7% |
6% |
When drilling down into specific patient groups, it is families and working-aged people who are most likely to receive a service that the CQC would consider as ‘requiring improvement’.
CQC Service Rating for Different Patients |
People With Long Term Conditions |
Families, children and young people |
Older people |
Work age people |
People with poor mental health |
Vulnerable people |
Inadequate |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
Requires improvement |
4% |
5% |
2% |
5% |
3% |
2% |
Good |
91% |
5% |
4% |
90% |
92% |
91% |
Outstanding |
5% |
90% |
94% |
5% |
7% |
7% |


Our conclusion
Overall, it appears that when it comes to local healthcare provision there is somewhat of a ‘postcode lottery’.
While there are some city or town-specific trends between poor patient reviews and low CQC ratings, more often than not it appears to be largely down to the practice itself, with some GPs looking to offer a very high-quality service to their patients, while others in the area appear to fall below expected standards.
While an inadequate rating doesn’t necessarily equate to poor patient care, where there is a concern regarding safety and leadership capability it does suggest that there are risks to those who rely on those GP surgeries.
The support we can offer
We believe that GP surgeries are a vital front line of defence for people and that they should be adequately funded, and support should be made available to implement changes as needed following CQC inspections.
Sadly, failings in care at GP surgeries can have a devastating impact on patients. Where failings are identified, it is our opinion that lessons learnt should be shared across all surgeries to protect patients.
Patients who suffer as a result of medical negligence often pursue a claim for compensation to pay for follow up treatment, loss of earnings and rehabilitation. However, many take legal action in a bid to ensure that changes are made
If you believe you have experienced care from your GP that was below the expected level, then our expert solicitors are on hand to offer you a Free Claims Assessment.
We’ve recovered compensation for many people who have suffered because of medical negligence, and we’ve helped them to gain access to the specialist care, treatment and rehabilitation they need to start to rebuild their lives again.
We understand that taking legal action can seem frightening, but we pride ourselves on our friendly and supportive approach.
Our study in more detail
Our study was conducted in March and June 2022 using live data sources that will change over time. Further information about our sources and the methodology used are below.
Sources
- List of GPs and practices - https://digital.nhs.uk/services/organisation-data-service/file-downloads/gp-and-gp-practice-related-data
- Google review data - https://www.google.com/maps
- To find each GPs CQC rating - https://www.cqc.org.uk/care-service/find-family-doctor-or-gp
- Information on inspection processes - https://www.cqc.org.uk/guidance-providers/independent-healthcare/when-we-will-inspect-independent-healthcare-services
- Categorisation information - https://www.cqc.org.uk/guidance-providers/how-we-inspect-regulate/how-we-prioritise-risk-0
Methodology
- We downloaded a list of the latest list of active GP surgeries in England
- We filtered these by city
- We selected a list of 21 mayor towns and cities, considering their population size and geographical distribution across England - we did not include London
- We looked up each GP surgery name in Google Maps, and noted down the number of times it has been reviewed, and the average review rating
- We then looked up each GP surgery name in the CQC database and noted down details about its inspection and review ratings
- We then worked out the average review rating and CQC 'standard' per city or town
- We also looked at how recently GP surgeries have been inspected. We refer to 'since the start of Covid-19' which means before 23rd March 2022
- When preparing the ‘best 20’ and ‘worst 20’ lists, we discounted any GP practices with fewer than ten online reviews
- In some towns / cities, there were not matching listings on Google and the CQC database (in terms of the practice name or address) and so only the available data was included and counted
Get in touch, today!
Fill in the form below to get in touch with one of our dedicated team members, or call our team today on: 0808 239 6043