Child with Verbal Dyspraxia Secures Specialist Residential Placement

The family were sure that this was the right place for Joshua. They therefore contacted the Local Authority’s Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) team to request that the independent school be named in section I of his education, health and care (EHC) plan. However, the local authority didn’t agree to this and instead named another option - a specialist local school for children with profound and multiple learning difficulties and those with challenging behaviour.

After visiting the school, the family was convinced that this wasn’t the right place for Joshua and may potentially limit his progress, as it didn’t offer enough specialist support for his verbal dyspraxia. The local authority weren’t prepared to consider the independent school for Joshua, citing it as an inefficient use of educational resources. His family therefore felt they had no option but to appeal this decision at a SEND tribunal.

How our Education Solicitors helped

We received instructions to represent the child after the appeal had been lodged and we advised the parents to seek independent advice from a speech and language therapist. The therapist’s evidence became central to the case, with a report she produced explaining the need for expert and intensive daily therapy for a child with verbal dyspraxia and also why specialist intervention was required through the waking day.

The therapist attended the Special Needs Tribunal Appeal hearing as a witness and was able to answer many questions from the Judge on verbal dyspraxia and how it’s treated. The Tribunal noted the difficulties with phrases like waking day and 24-hour curriculum, but found that support from staff trained and experienced in verbal dyspraxia was required through the day to assist in the acquisition of language development.

The case was complicated by the fact that the child has moderate learning difficulties and arguments from the authority that verbal dyspraxia therapy would therefore not be effective. But on considering the evidence, the Tribunal decided a residential placement was required.

What did our client say about the experience?

“After logging the appeal myself, it quickly became apparent that we would need specialist legal support to help us with the complicated process of submitting the paperwork for the SEND tribunal and to represent us on the day of the hearing. Simpson Millar were recommended to us by another family who had used them and subsequently received a successful outcome in a similar case.

“Emily Gent was instructed to act on our behalf after an initial consultation call and from thereon, took full control of obtaining the relevant information and submitting the bundle to the SEND tribunal.

“The amendment to the working document was a particularly delicate process and involved regular interaction with the Local Authority to gradually build up an education, health and care plan that was suitable to meet Joshua's needs. This was carried out meticulously by Emily and the majority of special needs support for Joshua had already been agreed prior to the tribunal hearing

“On the day of the final hearing, the overriding issue and main point for the Judge to decide was whether Joshua required a waking day curriculum. This would help decide whether Joshua would be placed at the independent school or the local authority school, which had now been changed to a mainstream provision with a specialist hub.

“Emily and the specialist experts all argued that Joshua needed specialist support throughout the day and the SEND tribunal judge also agreed that this was necessary for him. The independent special school was then named in section I of the EHC plan.

“The level of support from Emily and the Simpson Millar team was fantastic and we could not have achieved this outcome without the help provided.”