Do I Need to Give Consent for Surgery?

Author:
Geoffrey Simpson-Scott
Partner, Medical Negligence Solicitor
Date:
13/05/2019

Yes. As a human being, provided we’re of sound mind and capable of making decisions, we have the absolute right to determine what happens to our bodies.

Informed Consent

Consent to a medical treatment such as surgery recognises the right of an individual to determine and control what happens to their bodies. We call it “informed consent”. So, it isn’t sufficient for a doctor or surgeon to rely on the fact that a patient has signed a consent form, as consent is an ongoing process.

If you believe surgical decisions have been made without your informed consent, get in touch with our Medical Negligence Solicitors for free legal advice.

Call us on 08002605010 or request a callback and we will help you.

Made Aware of the Risks

Doctors and surgeons must ensure that a patient is made aware of the risks of any treatments they offer, and whether there are any alternatives. This is particularly important in cases involving plastic surgery, where the patient has a real choice compared to, for example, a life-saving surgical operation to remove a malignant tumour.

The inevitable question that arises is “if the warnings had been given, what would the patient have done?” The case of Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board can help us answer this question.

Mrs Montgomery was diabetic, a condition that can often lead to a pregnant woman having larger than normal babies. This in turn leads to an increased risk of shoulder dystocia, where the baby’s head may descend through the pelvis but cannot pass through without medical intervention.

Her doctor didn’t warn her that normal vaginal delivery carried a 9-10% risk of shoulder dystocia, and didn’t offer a caesarean section as an alternative. Mrs Montgomery gave birth by way of vaginal delivery and there was shoulder dystocia leading to her son being born with cerebral palsy. Had he been delivered by caesarean section, he would not have suffered the birth injury and been a healthy baby.

The Court held that the Consultant should have warned of the risk of shoulder dystocia and discussed alternatives such as having a caesarean section.

In this type of situation, there are three questions that need to be explored:

      • What warnings were given?
      • What warnings should have been given?
      • If those warnings had been given, would the patient have consented to the surgery?

Informed consent is a live issue in medical law. So wherever possible, patients and relatives should continue to ask questions and demand information before elective procedures to ensure that they have the best possible information before deciding to proceed to surgery.

For free legal advice call our Medical Negligence Solicitors

We're happy to help

Monday to Friday 8:30am-7:00pm

08002 605 010

08002 605 010

We're happy to call you

Simply click below to arrange a call

Request a Call Back

Request a Callback

This data will only be used by Simpson Millar in accordance with our Privacy Policy for processing your query and for no other purpose

Simpson Millar is a national law firm with over 500 staff and offices in Bristol, Cardiff, Lancaster, Leeds, Liverpool, London - Euston, London - Fleet Street, London - Teddington, Manchester, Morecambe and Southport.